WebJun 1, 2014 · The charge of conspiracy having failed before the High Court and the main co-conspirators, accused Nos. 1 and 2, having been acquitted, the High Court convict ed these accused under s. 302 read with s. 34 only. But, accepting the appeal flied by the State, the High Court enhanced their sentence from life imprisonment to death. WebDagdu v. State of Maharashtra, April 1977. The Supreme Court held that the decision in Santa Singh v. State of Punjab, August 1976 cannot be read to say that failure on the part of the court to 'hear' an accused on the question of sentence must necessarily entail a remand to the trial court. After convicting an accused, courts must ...
SASI Vs. STATE OF KERALA Indian Case Law Law CaseMine
WebDagdu & Ors Vs. State of Maharashtra [1977] INSC 125 (19 April 1977) Evidence Act 1972--Sections 114 illustration (b) and 133--Accomplice evidence, whether a competent witness--Whether conviction can be based on uncorroborated evidence of an accomplice--Appreciation--Rule of corroboration---Presumption by courts. WebFeb 9, 2024 · Bombay High Court Sahebrao Dagdu Walke vs The State Of Maharashtra And … on 18 November, 2024Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, R. N. Laddha 11669.21WP+.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1016 WRIT PETITION NO.11669 OF 2024 VISHWANATH BABURAO KADAM VERSUS THE … do we have bases in ukraine
Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Indian Contract Act, 1872
WebFeb 7, 2003 · Dagdu Chotu Pathan v. Rahimbi Dagdu Pathan - 2002 (3) Mh.L.J. 602 wherein the question as to whether a Muslim husband has a right to divorce h...and the Full Bench of this Court in. the ease of Dagdu Chotu Pathan, held as under : "A divorce by the husband is Talaq and it. has its oral as well as written forms. WebSep 18, 2024 · Janardan Dagdu Khomane and Another - Appellants. Versus. Eknath Bhiku Yadav & Ors. - Respondents. ... consequential to which new areas which originally formed part of the Madhya Pradesh State became part of the Maharashtra State, necessitated amendments in the Bombay Trusts Act to incorporate Schedule AA, which, read with … WebApr 25, 1977 · Dagdu & Ors Vs. State of Maharashtra [1977] INSC 125 (19 April 1977) CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. GOSWAMI, P.K. ... State of Bihar;(2) Haroon Haji Abdulla v. State of Maharashtra;(a) and Ravinder Singh v. State of Haryana(4). In Hari Charan(2) Gajendragadkar, C.J., speaking for a five-Judge Bench … cj mccollum growth spurt